An Internet acquaintance of mine, Chris Meissen, made the following statement.Look at the history of the gun laws in places like Chicago and New York. The gun laws were not passed to protect the citizens from criminals. Rather, they were passed to protect the most politically powerful criminals from less well-connected criminals and from the citizens upon which they preyed.That statement made me pause. A little research about one of the nations most famous anti-gun law, New York's Sullivan Act of 1910 and other long-time gun control laws reveals the common motivation driving gun control is to protect the politically active elements, whether kleptocrats or other political bodies, from the public at large.
The Sullivan Act, named after "Big Tim" Sullivan, a politician and organized crime boss of that era was enacted to remove weapons from the growing immigrant population of the city. The purpose of the law was to allow Sullivan:
- the ability to provide arms to his body guards.
- insure his opponents guards would be unarmed
- allow the corrupt police to arrest his opponents for gun violations whether they were guilty or not.
As a former Illinois resident, I saw a number of individuals carrying concealed weapons. Since non-law enforcement persons were prohibited from carrying a weapon, the popular justification to legally carry was to be designated a reserve or auxiliary Officer or Deputy.
Gun Control has nothing to do with reducing gun violence. The purpose of Gun Control is control of political opponents by preventing them the means of enacting their opposition.

0 comments:
Post a Comment